The proxy voting system has taken on added significance amid rising curiosity in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) points and the way buyers vote on associated shareholder proposals. Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) and Glass Lewis, particularly, present important steerage, and shareholders who wish to vote their proxies rely upon them to execute their proxy votes in a considerate and clear method. However with solely two gamers dominating the house, are buyers actually getting the range of views they should make knowledgeable proxy votes?
That’s the place a brand new database, OxProx, is available in. Based by Ian Robertson, CFA, who co-authored this text, OxProx is a social enterprise spin-off with the College of Oxford and is the primary publicly accessible service that gathers, examines, and compares proxy voting information amongst asset house owners and asset managers from throughout the globe.
The Significance of ISS and Glass Lewis
To make sure, by providing analysis, steerage, and document protecting, ISS and Glass Lewis are important pillars of the proxy voting system. Buyers with 1000’s of shares of their portfolio can hardly analysis every proxy vote. They’re higher off instituting a coverage to information their voting whereas paying further consideration to particular points that align with their experience and pursuits.
Are Two Platforms Sufficient?
Regulators, lecturers, and buyers have acknowledged that the preeminence of ISS and Glass Lewis, might result in a dearth of different views on how shareholders ought to vote, and that will compel buyers to default to the advice of the proxy advisory service they subscribe to.
Pension plans and different massive buyers have the capability to mitigate this duopoly problem by subscribing to both or each ISS and Glass Lewis and incorporating their steerage as an data enter relatively than a default vote. They’ll then layer in their very own analysis and views on sure proxy votes over and above what ISS and Glass Lewis present or what can be attainable by a normal voting coverage method. Attributable to time and price constraints, nonetheless, many small- and medium-sized corporations haven’t any alternative in most cases however to defer to the 2 dominant gamers.
A Useful Step
With OxProx‘s publicly accessible and searchable database of worldwide proxy voting information, buyers and analysts can evaluate how buyers voted their proxies and what their voting rationales had been if and when they’re disclosed. When does an investor’s proxy vote align with ISS and Glass Lewis steerage? When does it differ? Does an investor all the time assist administration or shareholder proposals? OxProx makes such information out there and findable.
Vote disclosure necessities and practices are ruled on the nationwide stage, in order a world database, OxProx facilitates extra strong comparisons.
Who Advantages from Proxy Knowledge Transparency?
ShareAction in the UK, As You Sow in america, and SHARE in Canada, amongst different stakeholder and shareholder advocacy teams, are all doing necessary work on ESG points. However these organizations don’t view proxy voting by a shareholder or monetary materiality lens. That’s, they aren’t overly influenced by whether or not shareholder returns can be materially affected by sure ESG selections. Quite, they have interaction with corporations and industries on greenhouse fuel emissions and different ESG points to advocate for adjustments that may profit all stakeholders and society at massive even when they could scale back shareholder earnings.
OxProx information might help inform these group on the best way to method and maintain corporations and buyers accountable when their coverage voting runs counter to each long-term shareholder and stakeholder pursuits. The contested director elections at Exxon Mobil in 2021 is a case in point. Skeptical of the corporate’s carbon-transition technique, funding agency Engine No. 1 led a profitable activist marketing campaign for seats on the board.
The Investor and the Adviser
The proxy voting system is a vital conduit for public corporations and their buyers, with ISS and Glass Lewis main the way in which. However the transparency and accountability challenges are actual and OxProx might help handle these deficits by offering correct and well timed information on how totally different buyers have voted.
As ESG elements grow to be more and more integral to funding selections, platforms like OxProx might help promote accountable funding and drive optimistic change in company outcomes.
For a few years reconciling ESG points with funding efficiency posed a problem to fiduciaries who equated ESG concerns with screening shares from portfolios. All issues being equal, a screened portfolio is much less diversified. Absent market mispricing of the screened investments, such a portfolio will yield decrease risk-adjusted returns. Incorporating materials ESG points into funding evaluation and safety choice is now commonplace apply for lively managers and thought of a part of their fiduciary obligation. For some managers, participating with choose corporations on ESG points can present additional analytical perception and encourage investee corporations to pursue higher shareholder and stakeholder outcomes.
Stakeholders and advocacy teams might in flip nudge funding managers to hunt higher ESG outcomes. Whereas these might not improve monetary returns, they could not detract from them both.
Certainly, the transparency OxProx offers might persuade buyers to enhance their proxy voting on ESG points — to the purpose the place there are not any diminished monetary returns and ESG proposals with optimistic web current worth (NPV) have better assist.
In the event you appreciated this submit, don’t overlook to subscribe to the Enterprising Investor.
All posts are the opinion of the creator(s). As such, they shouldn’t be construed as funding recommendation, nor do the opinions expressed essentially mirror the views of CFA Institute or the creator’s employer.
Picture credit score: ©Getty Photographs / deeaf
Skilled Studying for CFA Institute Members
CFA Institute members are empowered to self-determine and self-report skilled studying (PL) credit earned, together with content material on Enterprising Investor. Members can document credit simply utilizing their online PL tracker.